Snap share
40%
likely 16–57%
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 1 | — |
| Yards | 0 | — |
| Yards / carry | 0 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 0 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 1 | 1257th / 1676 |
| Yards | 11 | 1293rd / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 11 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 11 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Morgan State | 71 | ~28 (13–40) | 1 | 1 | · | 39% |
| Wk 2 · Texas A&M | 63 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | · | · | 41% |
| Wk 3 · Kansas | 66 | · | · | · | 2 | — |
| Season | 134 | 54 (22–77) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the Arizona State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | AJ Ia | TE | SO | 2 | 19 | 1 | 6% | +1.49 |
| 15 | Khamari Anderson | TE | SR | 1 | 21 | 0 | 3% | +1.40 |
| 87 | James Giggey | TE | JR | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1% | +0.25 |
| 19 | Landen Miree | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Kristian Ingman | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Anthony Miller | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Hayden Vercher | TE | FR | — | — | — | 3% | -0.92 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Arizona State depth chart →