Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 35 | — |
| Target share | 18.1% | 206th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 65.7% | 245th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 57.1% | 99th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 12.1 | 31st / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 28.6% | 9th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 34.3% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 20 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 3 | — |
Charting
Where Huggins's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted36 targets charted
Game Log
Maleek Huggins's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Pittsburgh | L 14–59 | 5.6 | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 0 | 9 |
| 2 |  Holy Cross | W 45–7 | 6.6 | 3 | 54 | 18.0 | 0 | 28 |
| 3 | @ Cincinnati | L 31–35 | 8.7 | 4 | 128 | 32.0 | 1 | 41 |
| 4 |  UConn | W 24–21 | 5.3 | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 0 | 20 |
| 5 |  Bowling Green | L 20–24 | 6.1 | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 0 | 17 |
| 6 | @ Massachusetts | W 20–19 | 6.4 | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 0 | 25 |
| 7 |  Akron | W 34–14 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 8 | @ Central Michigan | W 28–27 | 8.4 | 7 | 122 | 17.4 | 0 | 37 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 6.7 | 24 | 431 | 18.0 | 1 | 41 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 24 | 229th / 2089 |
| Yards | 431 | 114th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 18 | 25th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 41 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Pittsburgh | — | 58 | ~45 (30–55) | 7 | 78% |
| Wk 2 · Holy Cross | — | 54 | ~31 (10–42) | 3 | 57% |
| Wk 3 · Cincinnati | ✓ WR | 56 | ~23 (7–31) | 4 | 41% |
| Wk 4 · UConn | ✓ WR | 61 | ~15 (5–21) | 2 | 25% |
| Wk 5 · Bowling Green | ✓ WR | 59 | ~34 (11–47) | 5 | 58% |
| Wk 6 · Massachusetts | — | 57 | ~33 (11–45) | 4 | 58% |
| Wk 7 · Akron | — | 51 | ~10 (3–16) | 1 | 20% |
| Wk 8 · Central Michigan | — | 69 | ~56 (37–68) | 10 | 81% |
| Season | 3 GS | 465 | 247 (153–300) | 36 | 53% |
Position Room
19 WRs on the Miami (OH) roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maleek Huggins | WR | SR | 24 | 431 | 1 | 16% | +1.02 |
| 10 | Lynel Billups-Williams | WR | JR | 24 | 289 | 2 | 17% | +0.35 |
| 24 | Scoop Smith | WR | FR | 18 | 189 | 1 | 11% | +0.58 |
| Damarion Witten | WR | 17 | 346 | 4 | 13% | +0.81 | ||
| 18 | Braylon Isom | WR | SO | 11 | 159 | 0 | 13% | +0.10 |
| 2 | Carl Jenkins | WR | SO | 6 | 90 | 0 | 5% | +1.34 |
| 3 | Quintin Simmons | WR | FR | 2 | 8 | 0 | 4% | -0.20 |
| 2 | Brady Simmons | WR | SR | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3% | +0.05 |
| 4 | Devin Hyatt | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | Keith Reynolds | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | Will Pressley | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | Justen Hodge | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | Jackson Ruth | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Michael Parrish | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Andrew Bjorson | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Tristan Reed | WR | FR | — | — | — | 7% | -0.40 |
| 86 | Wilson Roberts | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Leo Scheidler | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | CJ Castner | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Miami (OH) depth chart →