Snap share
38%
likely 21–50%
Receptions
2
991st of 1676 in FBS
Rec. yards
13
1226th of 1662 in FBS
Yards / catch
6.5
Rec. TD
0
EPA / play
-0.20
6 plays

Efficiency & Role

EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies

EPA per play by situation

6 plays · -1.2 total EPA · not enough plays to rank yet
All plays-0.20
Passing-0.20
1st down-0.72
2nd down-0.11
3rd down+0.23
Standard downs-0.72
Passing downs+0.06
SmithWR/TE average

Share of team plays

How often the offense runs through this player. Pass = targets or dropbacks, rush = carries
All plays3%
Pass plays5%
Run plays0%
1st down2%
2nd down3%
3rd down6%
Standard downs1%
Passing downs7%
SmithWR/TE average

Advanced

Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume

ReceivingValueFBS rank
Targets6—
Target share5.4%—
Catch rate33.3%—
Success rate per target33.3%—
Yards per target2.2—
Explosive catches0.0%—
Deep-target rate0.0%—
3rd-down targets2—
Red-zone targets1—

2026 Season Stats

FBS rank among qualifying players

Receiving2026FBS rank
Receptions2991st / 1676
Yards131226th / 1662
Yards / catch6.5—
Touchdowns0—
Long7—

Snaps by Game

Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works

GameTeam playsEst. snapsPlays involvedSnap share
Wk 1 · Louisville78~33 (15–47)342%
Wk 2 · Charlotte58~23 (11–33)140%
Wk 3 · LSU73~23 (11–33)232%
Season20979 (43–105)638%

Position Room

6 TEs on the Ole Miss roster, ordered by rec

#PlayerPosClassRecYdsTDTgt shareEPA/play
4Caleb OdomTEJR8154115%+0.91
9Luke HaszTESR63206%+0.14
Michael SmithTE21305%-0.20
42Jack HarperTESO—————
80Hayden BradleyTEFR—————
86Brady PrieskornTESO—————

Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Ole Miss depth chart →