Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 40 | — |
| Target share | 15.7% | 297th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 62.5% | 313th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 45.0% | 322nd / 534 |
| Yards per target | 7.9 | 275th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 12.5% | 209th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 7.5% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 12 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 7 | — |
Charting
Where Odom's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted42 targets charted
2025 charting · Ole Miss
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Odom’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted12 targets charted
Career
3 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Ole Miss#10 · 6-2 | 7 | 57% | 27 | 360 | 2 | 15.7% |
| 2025 | Ole Miss#9 · 13-2 | 8 | 26% | 19 | 197 | 2 | 6.2% |
| 2024 |  Alabama#7 · 9-4 | 4 | 19% | 7 | 65 | 0 | 2.9% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Caleb Odom's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Caleb Odom's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | vs Louisville | W 41–38 | 8.6 | 3 | 66 | 22.0 | 1 | 35 |
| 2 |  Charlotte | W 41–9 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  LSU | W 32–24 | 8.7 | 5 | 88 | 17.6 | 0 | 30 |
| 4 | @ Florida | L 28–52 | 7.5 | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 0 | 33 |
| 6 | @ Vanderbilt | W 52–17 | 6.7 | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 0 | 12 |
| 7 |  Missouri | W 31–3 | 7.8 | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 1 | 18 |
| 8 | @ Texas | L 27–34 | 7.9 | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 0 | 24 |
| 9 |  Auburn | W 45–15 | 6.6 | 1 | 34 | 34.0 | 0 | 34 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 7.7 | 27 | 360 | 13.3 | 2 | 35 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 27 | 185th / 2089 |
| Yards | 360 | 175th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 13.3 | 183rd / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 35 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Louisville | ✓ TE | 78 | ~45 (38–54) | 5 | 1 | · | 58% |
| Wk 3 · LSU | ✓ TE | 73 | ~50 (42–60) | 8 | · | 1 | 68% |
| Wk 4 · Florida | ✓ TE | 61 | ~40 (34–48) | 5 | · | · | 66% |
| Wk 6 · Vanderbilt | — | 65 | ~47 (40–57) | 5 | · | 1 | 72% |
| Wk 7 · Missouri | — | 74 | ~48 (41–58) | 6 | · | 4 | 65% |
| Wk 8 · Texas | ✓ TE | 82 | ~63 (53–76) | 11 | · | · | 77% |
| Wk 9 · Auburn | — | 84 | ~36 (17–51) | 3 | · | · | 43% |
| Season | 4 GS | 575 | 329 (281–393) | 43 | 1 | 6 | 57% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Ole Miss roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Caleb Odom | TE | JR | 27 | 360 | 2 | 16% | +0.46 |
| 9 | Luke Hasz | TE | SR | 12 | 89 | 0 | 6% | +0.32 |
| Michael Smith | TE | 3 | 17 | 1 | 4% | -0.29 | ||
| 42 | Jack Harper | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Hayden Bradley | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Brady Prieskorn | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Ole Miss depth chart →