Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 10 | — |
| Target share | 3.8% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 50.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 9.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Lemaster's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted11 targets charted
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Eastern Michigan#124 · 4-5 | 8 | 32% | 8 | 96 | 0 | 3.8% |
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan#117 · 4-8 | 4 | 10% | 5 | 69 | 0 | 5.2% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Tanner Lemaster's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Tanner Lemaster's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Sacramento State | W 28–17 | 5.1 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1 |  San José State | L 21–27 | 4.7 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 2 | @ Michigan State | L 7–35 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 | @ Wisconsin | L 10–54 | 6.2 | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 0 | 23 |
| 4 |  Lindenwood | W 29–3 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 5 | @ Massachusetts | W 38–14 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 6 | @ Akron | W 25–23 | 3.2 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 |  Toledo | L 14–34 | 5.2 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
| 8 | @ Ohio | L 20–24 | 6.6 | 1 | 34 | 34.0 | 0 | 34 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.0 | 8 | 96 | 12.0 | 0 | 34 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 8 | 841st / 2089 |
| Yards | 96 | 792nd / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 12 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 34 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Sacramento State | — | 68 | ~21 (10–30) | 1 | 1 | 31% |
| Wk 1 · San José State | ✓ TE | 68 | ~21 (10–30) | 1 | · | 31% |
| Wk 3 · Wisconsin | — | 60 | ~25 (12–36) | 2 | · | 42% |
| Wk 4 · Lindenwood | ✓ TE | 69 | ~28 (13–40) | 2 | · | 41% |
| Wk 5 · Massachusetts | — | 68 | ~21 (10–30) | 1 | · | 31% |
| Wk 6 · Akron | — | 78 | ~22 (10–31) | 1 | 1 | 28% |
| Wk 7 · Toledo | ✓ TE | 71 | ~24 (11–34) | 2 | · | 34% |
| Wk 8 · Ohio | — | 68 | ~30 (14–43) | 2 | · | 44% |
| Season | 3 GS | 602 | 192 (147–268) | 12 | 2 | 32% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the Eastern Michigan roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Joshua Long | TE | JR | 42 | 383 | 2 | 16% | +0.40 |
| 88 | Tanner Lemaster | TE | SR | 8 | 96 | 0 | 4% | +0.45 |
| 14 | Armaad Sharp | TE | FR | 3 | 19 | 0 | 3% | -0.19 |
| 16 | Jackson Holt | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | Payton Kokaly | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 48 | Nathan Piggott | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 49 | Brady Shelton | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Eastern Michigan depth chart →