Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 10 | — |
| Target share | 4.2% | — |
| Catch rate | 80.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 80.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 10.4 | — |
| Explosive catches | 10.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Baker's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted11 targets charted
Game Log
Tron Baker's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  San José State | W 42–26 | 6.4 | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 0 | 20 |
| 1 |  Fresno State | W 39–0 | 5.6 | 1 | 27 | 27.0 | 0 | 27 |
| 2 |  Louisiana | W 49–30 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 | @ Rutgers | W 42–35 | 4.7 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
| 4 |  Oregon | L 27–41 | 5.7 | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 0 | 15 |
| 5 |  Washington | W 25–21 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 | @ Penn State | W 31–23 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 8 | @ Wisconsin | L 7–24 | 4.8 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 9 |  Ohio State | W 30–18 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2026 · 5 games | 5.4 | 9 | 124 | 13.8 | 0 | 27 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 9 | 761st / 2089 |
| Yards | 124 | 656th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 13.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 27 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · San José State | ✓ WR | 76 | ~29 (9–40) | 4 | 38% |
| Wk 1 · Fresno State | — | 68 | ~7 (2–11) | 1 | 10% |
| Wk 2 · Louisiana | — | 72 | ~14 (4–23) | 1 | 19% |
| Wk 3 · Rutgers | — | 63 | ~11 (3–18) | 1 | 17% |
| Wk 4 · Oregon | — | 75 | ~18 (6–25) | 2 | 24% |
| Wk 5 · Washington | — | 69 | ~11 (3–18) | 1 | 16% |
| Wk 8 · Wisconsin | — | 75 | ~7 (2–11) | 1 | 9% |
| Season | 1 GS | 611 | 97 (28–159) | 11 | 16% |
Position Room
12 WRs on the USC roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Trent Mosley | WR | FR | 32 | 512 | 6 | 24% | +0.67 |
| 17 | Kayden Dixon-Wyatt | WR | FR | 32 | 443 | 4 | 16% | +0.46 |
| Zach Williams | WR | 21 | 344 | 1 | 8% | +0.99 | ||
| 16 | Tanook Hines | WR | SO | 19 | 239 | 4 | 13% | +0.72 |
| 10 | Corey Simms | WR | SO | 12 | 178 | 1 | 12% | +0.67 |
| 1 | Ethan Feaster | WR | FR | 10 | 96 | 0 | 4% | +0.38 |
| 85 | Tron Baker | WR | FR | 9 | 124 | 0 | 4% | +0.85 |
| 9 | Terrell Anderson | WR | JR | 2 | 50 | 0 | 9% | +0.94 |
| 18 | Romero Ison | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Cameron Sermons | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Luke Degner | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Griffin Brahm | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. USC depth chart →