Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 68 | — |
| Success rate | 54.4% | 36th / 332 |
| Explosive run rate | 16.2% | 81st / 332 |
| Stuffed at the line | 11.8% | 83rd / 332 |
| First downs | 22 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 10 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 2 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 34 | — |
| Target share | 10.8% | 493rd / 534 |
| Catch rate | 76.5% | 72nd / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 47.1% | 288th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 8.8 | 203rd / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 8.8% | 347th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 5.9% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 5 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 5 | — |
Charting
Where Newberry's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted35 targets charted
Run direction71 carries
2025 charting · Vanderbilt
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Oregon State#62 · 5-3 | 8 | 44% | 72 | 465 | 6.5 | 3 | 54.4% | 26 | 299 | 1 | 10.8% |
| 2025 |  Vanderbilt#11 · 10-3 | 10 | 13% | 18 | 57 | 3.2 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 18 | 0 | 5.0% |
| 2024 | Vanderbilt#50 · 7-6 | 11 | 20% | 41 | 185 | 4.5 | 3 | 50.0% | 7 | 134 | 2 | 4.7% |
| 2023 | Vanderbilt#115 · 2-10 | 4 | 8% | 20 | 96 | 4.8 | 0 | 27.3% | — | — | — | 4.0% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. AJ Newberry's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
AJ Newberry's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Houston | L 20–33 | 6.5 | 7 | 17 | 2.4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 0 | 25 |
| 2 |  Texas Tech | L 24–35 | 6.9 | 5 | 8 | 1.6 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 0 | 17 |
| 3 |  Montana | W 52–17 | 7.5 | 7 | 45 | 6.4 | 0 | 21 | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 0 | 40 |
| 4 | @ UTEP | W 33–7 | 7.9 | 11 | 111 | 10.1 | 1 | 35 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 5 | @ Colorado State | W 56–26 | 7.4 | 15 | 90 | 6.0 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 0 | 11 |
| 6 |  San Diego State | W 66–14 | 6.8 | 9 | 55 | 6.1 | 1 | 27 | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 5 |
| 7 |  Washington State | W 48–30 | 9.9 | 11 | 105 | 9.5 | 0 | 30 | 5 | 120 | 24.0 | 1 | 88 |
| 9 | @ Fresno State | L 22–38 | 5.8 | 7 | 34 | 4.9 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 7.3 | 72 | 465 | 6.5 | 3 | 35 | 26 | 299 | 11.5 | 1 | 88 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 1 | — |
| Attempts | 1 | — |
| Completion % | 100.0% | — |
| Yards | 4 | — |
| Yards / att. | 4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 72 | — |
| Yards | 465 | 93rd / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 6.5 | 26th / 312 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 192nd / 683 |
| Long | 35 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 26 | 199th / 2089 |
| Yards | 299 | 259th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 11.5 | 290th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 88 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Houston | ✓ RB | 73 | ~29 (20–38) | 11 | 40% |
| Wk 2 · Texas Tech | ✓ RB | 71 | ~32 (22–41) | 11 | 45% |
| Wk 3 · Montana | — | 68 | ~25 (17–32) | 11 | 37% |
| Wk 4 · UTEP | ✓ RB | 57 | ~33 (23–43) | 14 | 58% |
| Wk 5 · Colorado State | ✓ RB | 70 | ~38 (26–49) | 20 | 54% |
| Wk 6 · San Diego State | ✓ RB | 92 | ~28 (19–36) | 13 | 30% |
| Wk 7 · Washington State | — | 71 | ~35 (24–45) | 17 | 49% |
| Wk 9 · Fresno State | — | 87 | ~37 (25–48) | 11 | 43% |
| Season | 5 GS | 589 | 257 (204–317) | 108 | 44% |
Position Room
7 RBs on the Oregon State roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | AJ Newberry | RB | SR | 72 | 465 | 6.5 | 3 | 26 | +0.40 |
| 3 | Cornell Hatcher Jr. | RB | SO | 51 | 267 | 5.2 | 5 | 2 | +0.15 |
| 22 | Tre Garrison | RB | FR | 29 | 103 | 3.6 | 0 | 1 | -0.10 |
| 34 | Jake Reichle | RB | SR | 22 | 100 | 4.5 | 3 | 5 | +0.27 |
| 25 | Kourdey Glass | RB | FR | 17 | 80 | 4.7 | 0 | 5 | +0.06 |
| 27 | Rocco De La Rosa | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | Skyler Jackson | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Oregon State depth chart →