Snap share
42%
likely 23–56%
Receptions
3
788th of 1676 in FBS
Rec. yards
27
921st of 1662 in FBS
Yards / catch
9.0
Rec. TD
0
EPA / play
+0.09
5 plays
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 5.0% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 20.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.4 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 3 | 788th / 1676 |
| Yards | 27 | 921st / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 9 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 20 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Auburn | 98 | ~61 (52–74) | 3 | 62% |
| Wk 2 · Prairie View A&M | 84 | ~18 (8–26) | 1 | 21% |
| Wk 3 · Louisiana Tech | 67 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | 39% |
| Season | 249 | 105 (57–140) | 5 | 42% |
Position Room
5 TEs on the Baylor roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | Hawkins Polley | TE | SR | 3 | 27 | 0 | 4% | +0.09 |
| 10 | Tony Livingston | TE | SR | 2 | 28 | 0 | 2% | +1.67 |
| 85 | Matthew Klopfenstein | TE | SR | 2 | 12 | 0 | 3% | +0.12 |
| 46 | Parker Almanza | TE | FR | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2% | +2.91 |
| Kai Wesley | TE | — | — | — | 5% | -0.40 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Baylor depth chart →