Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 12 | — |
| Target share | 6.6% | — |
| Catch rate | 75.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 58.3% | — |
| Yards per target | 8.5 | — |
| Explosive catches | 25.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 8.3% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Livingston's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted14 targets charted
2025 charting · Florida
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Livingston’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted5 targets charted
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Baylor#34 · 5-3 | 7 | 43% | 12 | 132 | 3 | 6.6% |
| 2025 |  Florida#53 · 4-8 | 8 | 30% | 11 | 119 | 2 | 6.0% |
| 2024 | Florida#24 · 8-5 | 5 | 19% | 11 | 109 | 2 | 9.3% |
| 2023 | Florida#55 · 5-7 | 1 | 2% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2.3% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Tony Livingston's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Tony Livingston's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | vs Auburn | L 16–17 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Prairie View A&M | W 44–3 | 5.8 | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 0 | 19 |
| 3 |  Louisiana Tech | W 36–19 | 1.2 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| 4 |  Colorado | W 23–13 | 3.2 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 5 | @ Arizona State | W 55–19 | 6.7 | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 1 | 6 |
| 7 |  TCU | L 6–17 | 6.9 | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 0 | 20 |
| 8 | @ Kansas | L 24–25 | 6.3 | 1 | 27 | 27.0 | 0 | 27 |
| 9 | @ UCF | W 41–9 | 7.9 | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 2 | 21 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.4 | 12 | 132 | 11.0 | 3 | 27 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 12 | 600th / 2089 |
| Yards | 132 | 619th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 11 | — |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 127th / 914 |
| Long | 27 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Prairie View A&M | 84 | ~18 (8–26) | 1 | · | 21% |
| Wk 3 · Louisiana Tech | 67 | ~41 (35–50) | 1 | 1 | 61% |
| Wk 4 · Colorado | 74 | ~41 (35–50) | 2 | · | 55% |
| Wk 5 · Arizona State | 79 | ~34 (16–49) | 3 | · | 43% |
| Wk 7 · TCU | 86 | ~47 (40–57) | 4 | · | 55% |
| Wk 8 · Kansas | 66 | ~38 (18–54) | 1 | · | 58% |
| Wk 9 · UCF | 66 | ~48 (41–58) | 3 | · | 73% |
| Season | 620 | 267 (204–372) | 15 | 1 | 43% |
Position Room
5 TEs on the Baylor roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Tony Livingston | TE | SR | 12 | 132 | 3 | 6% | +0.93 |
| 86 | Hawkins Polley | TE | SR | 8 | 107 | 1 | 5% | +0.85 |
| 85 | Matthew Klopfenstein | TE | SR | 6 | 37 | 1 | 3% | +0.03 |
| 46 | Parker Almanza | TE | FR | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2% | +2.91 |
| Kai Wesley | TE | — | — | — | 5% | -0.40 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Baylor depth chart →