Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 9 | — |
| Target share | 9.0% | — |
| Catch rate | 77.8% | — |
| Success rate per target | 66.7% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.8 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Ford's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted10 targets charted
2025 charting · San Diego State
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (5 of Ford’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted10 targets charted
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  San Diego State#98 · 4-5 | 7 | 32% | 8 | 55 | 2 | 9.0% |
| 2025 | San Diego State#54 · 9-4 | 8 | 50% | 10 | 86 | 1 | 8.4% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Jackson Ford's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Jackson Ford's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Portland State | W 53–20 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 | @ UCLA | L 10–28 | 6.8 | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 1 | 19 |
| 3 |  James Madison | L 13–26 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 | @ Toledo | L 16–41 | 7.0 | 5 | 35 | 7.0 | 0 | 11 |
| 5 |  Texas State | W 31–29 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 | @ Oregon State | L 14–66 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 7 |  Fresno State | W 26–23 | 2.2 | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | @ Colorado State | L 49–56 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  Washington State | W 26–20 | 6.0 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 1 | 2 |
| 2026 · 4 games | 5.5 | 8 | 55 | 6.9 | 2 | 19 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 8 | 841st / 2089 |
| Yards | 55 | 1104th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 6.9 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 19 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Portland State | ✓ TE | 62 | ~38 (18–54) | 1 | · | 61% |
| Wk 2 · UCLA | ✓ TE | 56 | ~32 (15–46) | 1 | 1 | 57% |
| Wk 3 · James Madison | ✓ TE | 77 | · | · | · | — |
| Wk 4 · Toledo | ✓ TE | 68 | ~50 (42–60) | 6 | · | 74% |
| Wk 6 · Oregon State | ✓ TE | 48 | · | · | · | — |
| Wk 7 · Fresno State | ✓ TE | 62 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | · | 40% |
| Wk 9 · Washington State | — | 59 | ~34 (16–49) | 1 | · | 58% |
| Season | 6 GS | 554 | 179 (124–241) | 10 | 1 | 32% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the San Diego State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Jackson Ford | TE | JR | 8 | 55 | 2 | 8% | +0.58 |
| Ryan Wolfer | TE | 5 | 28 | 1 | 5% | +0.34 | ||
| 19 | Jack Lua | TE | FR | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3% | +0.21 |
| 47 | Kime Fangupo | TE | SO | — | — | — | 0% | -4.94 |
| 87 | Jack Ellis | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 98 | Parker Guiltinan | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 99 | Elijah Muliufi | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. San Diego State depth chart →