Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 6.7% | — |
| Catch rate | 66.7% | — |
| Success rate per target | 16.7% | — |
| Yards per target | 2.8 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Wolfer's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted7 targets charted
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  San Diego State#98 · 4-5 | 4 | 27% |
| 2025 | San Diego State#54 · 9-4 | 2 | 9% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Ryan Wolfer's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Ryan Wolfer's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Defense | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  Portland State | W 53–20 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 2 | @ UCLA | L 10–28 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 3 |  James Madison | L 13–26 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 | @ Toledo | L 16–41 | 6.7 | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 |  Texas State | W 31–29 | 3.7 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ Oregon State | L 14–66 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 7 |  Fresno State | W 26–23 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 8 | @ Colorado State | L 49–56 | 4.9 | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 5 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 9 |  Washington State | W 26–20 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 2026 · 4 games | 4.9 | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 1122nd / 2089 |
| Yards | 28 | 1395th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 5.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 11 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4438th / 5664 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 3 · James Madison | 77 | ~44 (37–53) | 2 | · | 57% |
| Wk 4 · Toledo | 68 | ~19 (9–27) | 1 | 1 | 28% |
| Wk 5 · Texas State | 52 | ~30 (14–43) | 1 | · | 58% |
| Wk 8 · Colorado State | 70 | ~55 (47–66) | 3 | · | 79% |
| Season | 554 | 148 (102–199) | 7 | 1 | 27% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the San Diego State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Jackson Ford | TE | JR | 8 | 55 | 2 | 8% | +0.58 |
| Ryan Wolfer | TE | 5 | 28 | 1 | 5% | +0.34 | ||
| 19 | Jack Lua | TE | FR | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3% | +0.21 |
| 47 | Kime Fangupo | TE | SO | — | — | — | 0% | -4.94 |
| 87 | Jack Ellis | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 98 | Parker Guiltinan | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 99 | Elijah Muliufi | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. San Diego State depth chart →