Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Run stops | 1 | 2852nd / 3422 |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| Pass breakups | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 4 | — |
Career
2 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Miami#3 · 8-0 | 5 | 20% |
| 2025 |  Ohio State#2 · 12-2 | 1 | 3% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Jarquez Carter's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Jarquez Carter's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ Stanford | W 45–6 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 2 |  Florida A&M | W 77–7 | 5.6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 3 | @ Wake Forest | W 33–20 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 4 |  Central Michigan | W 52–3 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 5 | @ Clemson | W 41–13 | 5.3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 |  Florida State | W 43–35 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 8 |  Pittsburgh | W 52–23 | 5.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 9 | @ North Carolina | W 38–35 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 2026 · 3 games | 5.5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 7 | 2784th / 5664 |
| Solo | 3 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Stanford | — | 67 | · | · | 1 | — |
| Wk 2 · Florida A&M | — | 47 | ~27 (11–43) | 2 | · | 57% |
| Wk 4 · Central Michigan | ✓ DL | 68 | · | · | · | — |
| Wk 5 · Clemson | — | 75 | ~41 (20–52) | 2 | · | 55% |
| Wk 8 · Pittsburgh | — | 61 | ~32 (12–50) | 3 | · | 52% |
| Season | 1 GS | 490 | 100 (52–131) | 7 | 1 | 20% |
Position Room
18 DLs on the Miami roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Marquise Lightfoot | DL | JR | 29 | 7.5 | 7 | — | 2 |
| 5 | Justin Scott | DL | JR | 25 | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 |
| 18 | Armondo Blount | DL | JR | 19 | 4 | 2.5 | — | 0 |
| 31 | Herbert Scroggins III | DL | SO | 8 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 |
| 99 | Ahmad Moten Sr. | DL | SR | 8 | 1.5 | 1 | — | 1 |
| 91 | Jarquez Carter | DL | SO | 7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Damon Wilson Jr. | DL | 6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | — | 2 | ||
| 40 | Keshawn Stancil | DL | FR | 5 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 97 | Keona Davis | DL | JR | 5 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 33 | Booker Pickett Jr. | DL | SO | 4 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 |
| 88 | DeAnthony Lafayette | DL | FR | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 13 | Asharri Charles | DL | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 55 | Mykah Newton | DL | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 42 | Logan Nagle | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Tyson Bacon | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 52 | Isaac Chukwurah | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 92 | Samuel Coufal | DL | JR | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 93 | Fred Sainteus | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Miami depth chart →