Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 4 | 736th / 2758 |
| Tackles for loss | 4 | 322nd / 2112 |
| Run stops | 5 | 1669th / 3422 |
| Sacks | 2 | — |
| Pass breakups | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 7 | — |
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD | Havoc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Wake Forest#14 · 7-1 | 5 | 27% | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | Wake Forest#57 · 9-4 | 3 | 5% | 4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Kadear Dembele's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Kadear Dembele's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  Akron | W 38–16 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 2 | @ Purdue | W 38–36 | 7.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 3 |  Miami | L 20–33 | 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 | @ Louisville | W 30–27 | 6.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 |  Stanford | W 57–3 | 6.6 | 3 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 | @ NC State | W 38–14 | 7.2 | 2 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 | @ California | W 41–7 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 9 |  Virginia | W 51–7 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 2026 · 5 games | 6.3 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 8 | 2631st / 5664 |
| Solo | 4 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 4 | 366th / 2634 |
| Sacks | 2 | 309th / 1383 |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Purdue | 82 | ~32 (12–50) | 1 | 1 | 39% |
| Wk 3 · Miami | 66 | ~31 (12–49) | 2 | · | 47% |
| Wk 4 · Louisville | 74 | ~20 (8–32) | 1 | · | 27% |
| Wk 5 · Stanford | 67 | ~33 (13–52) | 3 | · | 49% |
| Wk 6 · NC State | 63 | ~34 (13–54) | 2 | · | 54% |
| Season | 554 | 150 (85–193) | 9 | 1 | 27% |
Position Room
19 DLs on the Wake Forest roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Langston Hardy | DL | SR | 42 | 10.5 | 5.5 | — | 0 |
| 94 | Zach Lohavichan | DL | SR | 27 | 7.5 | 2.5 | — | 0 |
| 10 | Gabe Kirschke | DL | SR | 25 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 |
| 52 | Dallas Afalava | DL | SR | 18 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 97 | Matt Herron | DL | SR | 15 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Tyler Walton | DL | 9 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | ||
| 55 | Kadear Dembele | DL | FR | 8 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 |
| 9 | Camden Hardy | DL | SO | 7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 |
| 20 | Kerrington Lee | DL | JR | 6 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 99 | Josiah Pratt | DL | FR | 3 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 18 | D.J. Johnson | DL | SO | 2 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 |
| 90 | Sydir Mitchell | DL | JR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 91 | Lucas Smalls-Allen | DL | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 48 | Ryan Harrington | DL | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 93 | Cade Holles | DL | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Brandon Smiley | DL | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | ||
| 92 | Sefa Sackey | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 96 | Cooper Long | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 98 | Christian Harris | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Wake Forest depth chart →