Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 34 | — |
| Success rate | 44.1% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 5.9% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 14.7% | — |
| First downs | 10 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 22 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 10 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 3.8% | — |
| Catch rate | 80.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 8.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 4 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Chambers's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted6 targets charted
Run direction42 carries
Game Log
Landen Chambers's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Bethune-Cookman | W 73–6 | 7.7 | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 2 | 27 | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2 | @ Pittsburgh | L 7–12 | — | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 |  Georgia State | W 44–30 | 6.1 | 9 | 62 | 6.9 | 0 | 35 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 |  TCU | W 21–13 | 5.2 | 6 | 11 | 1.8 | 1 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 | @ Houston | L 17–27 | — | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ Oklahoma State | L 28–42 | — | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 8 |  BYU | W 39–31 | 6.9 | 9 | 22 | 2.4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 1 | 21 |
| 9 |  Baylor | L 9–41 | 4.3 | 7 | 24 | 3.4 | 0 | 8 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 8 games | 6.0 | 42 | 185 | 4.4 | 4 | 35 | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 1 | 21 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 42 | — |
| Yards | 185 | 353rd / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 4.4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 133rd / 683 |
| Long | 35 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 1122nd / 2089 |
| Yards | 58 | 1074th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 11.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 21 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Bethune-Cookman | 60 | ~16 (11–21) | 7 | 27% |
| Wk 2 · Pittsburgh | 54 | ~6 (2–12) | 1 | 11% |
| Wk 3 · Georgia State | 56 | ~16 (11–21) | 9 | 29% |
| Wk 4 · TCU | 53 | ~12 (3–23) | 6 | 23% |
| Wk 5 · Houston | 59 | ~10 (2–19) | 3 | 17% |
| Wk 6 · Oklahoma State | 83 | ~9 (2–17) | 3 | 11% |
| Wk 8 · BYU | 82 | ~33 (23–43) | 11 | 40% |
| Wk 9 · Baylor | 67 | ~27 (18–35) | 8 | 40% |
| Season | 514 | 129 (102–159) | 48 | 25% |
Position Room
7 RBs on the UCF roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Watson | RB | 92 | 597 | 6.5 | 3 | 8 | +0.11 | ||
| 11 | Landen Chambers | RB | JR | 42 | 185 | 4.4 | 4 | 5 | +0.30 |
| 4 | Taevion Swint | RB | FR | 32 | 162 | 5.1 | 2 | 4 | +0.01 |
| 20 | Kaj Baker | RB | FR | 6 | 30 | 5 | 0 | — | +0.14 |
| 35 | Agyeman Addae | RB | SO | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 1 | 1 | +0.77 |
| 24 | Arthur Lewis IV | RB | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | -0.47 |
| 42 | Chance Nixon | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. UCF depth chart →