EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 6.3% | — |
| Catch rate | 40.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 2.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 2 | 991st / 1676 |
| Yards | 13 | 1226th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 6.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 158th / 527 |
| Long | 11 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · New Mexico State | ✓ TE | 66 | ~39 (18–56) | 2 | 59% |
| Wk 1 · SMU | — | 67 | ~30 (14–43) | 2 | 45% |
| Wk 3 · Alabama | ✓ TE | 64 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | 41% |
| Season | 2 GS | 197 | 95 (52–127) | 5 | 48% |
8 TEs on the Florida State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Desirrio Riles | TE | SR | 2 | 9 | 0 | 4% | -0.35 |
| 18 | Landen Thomas | TE | JR | 2 | 13 | 1 | 6% | +0.49 |
| 23 | Chase Loftin | TE | SO | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3% | +1.19 |
| 44 | Gavin Markey | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Corbyn Fordham | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Xavier Tiller | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Drew Hardwick | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Greyson Labiad | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Florida State depth chart →