EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 7 | — |
| Success rate | 71.4% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 42.9% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 14.3% | — |
| First downs | 5 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 2 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 1 | — |
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (2 of Ray’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far | Boston College#81 · 4-4 | 3 | 6% | 7 | 42 | 6.0 | 0 | 71.4% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3.4% |
| 2025 | Maryland#84 · 4-8 | 12 | 28% | 67 | 289 | 4.3 | 2 | 40.6% | 11 | 50 | 0 | 5.9% |
| 2024 | Maryland#81 · 4-8 | 12 | 30% | 75 | 374 | 5.0 | 2 | 36.9% | 11 | 76 | 0 | 4.1% |
| 2023 | Maryland#29 · 8-5 | 1 | 2% | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Nolan Ray's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Nolan Ray's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ | L 15–34 | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 2 | W 28–21 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 3 | W 22–16 | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 0 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 4 | L 14–21 | no stats recorded | ||||||||||
| 5 | @ | L 16–25 | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 7 | W 27–21 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 8 | @ | W 49–27 | 3 | 36 | 12.0 | 0 | 13 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 9 | @ | L 2–47 | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 2026 · 4 games | 7 | 42 | 6.0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | ||
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 7 | — |
| Yards | 42 | 727th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 13 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 1 | 1711th / 2089 |
| Yards | 4 | 1973rd / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 4 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 0 | — |
| Solo | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 1 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Rutgers | 61 | ~11 (3–21) | 2 | 18% |
| Wk 3 · Maine | 61 | ~11 (3–21) | 3 | 18% |
| Wk 8 · Georgia Tech | 64 | ~11 (3–21) | 3 | 17% |
| Season | 510 | 33 (16–73) | 8 | 6% |
8 RBs on the Boston College roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Evan Dickens | RB | JR | 66 | 296 | 4.5 | 4 | 12 | +0.02 |
| 24 | Bo MacCormack III | RB | SO | 58 | 268 | 4.6 | 4 | 7 | +0.01 |
| 29 | Mekhi Dodd | RB | FR | 15 | 82 | 5.5 | 0 | 2 | -0.11 |
| 2 | Nolan Ray | RB | JR | 7 | 42 | 6 | 0 | 1 | -0.48 |
| 33 | Anthony Ferrucci | RB | JR | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | +0.21 |
| 20 | Billy Barrett | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | Sedric Addison | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | Tim Longo | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Boston College depth chart →