Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 47 | — |
| Target share | 22.5% | 111th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 74.5% | 100th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 53.2% | 171st / 534 |
| Yards per target | 8.8 | 205th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 14.9% | 146th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 14.9% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 10 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 6 | — |
Charting
Where Morgan's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted49 targets charted
2025 charting · Michigan
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Morgan’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted5 targets charted
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  UCLA#17 · 8-0 | 8 | 71% | 36 | 415 | 2 | 22.5% |
| 2025 |  Michigan#26 · 9-4 | 11 | 56% | 20 | 223 | 1 | 11.9% |
| 2024 | Michigan#22 · 8-5 | 10 | 59% | 27 | 139 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2023 | Michigan#1 · 15-0 | 14 | 47% | 22 | 204 | 2 | 9.1% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Semaj Morgan's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Semaj Morgan's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Returns | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | KR | KR yds | PR | PR yds | TD |
| 1 | @ California | W 45–24 | 5.0 | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | 7 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  San Diego State | W 28–10 | 7.7 | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 0 | 31 | · | · | 1 | 25 | · |
| 3 |  Purdue | W 52–38 | 8.0 | 4 | 72 | 18.0 | 2 | 27 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 | @ Maryland | W 54–3 | 5.2 | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 13 | · | · | 4 | 32 | · |
| 6 | @ Oregon | W 17–15 | 6.8 | 5 | 55 | 11.0 | 0 | 19 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 |  Wisconsin | W 17–7 | 6.2 | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 0 | 33 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 8 |  Michigan State | W 28–10 | 7.2 | 7 | 70 | 10.0 | 0 | 15 | · | · | 1 | 5 | · |
| 9 |  Nevada | W 27–0 | 6.2 | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 0 | 25 | · | · | 3 | 28 | · |
| 2026 · 8 games | 6.5 | 36 | 415 | 11.5 | 2 | 33 | · | · | 9 | 90 | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 0 | — |
| Attempts | 1 | — |
| Completion % | 0.0% | — |
| Yards | 0 | — |
| Yards / att. | 0 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 1 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 1 | — |
| Yards | 4 | 1235th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 4 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 36 | 88th / 2089 |
| Yards | 415 | 129th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 11.5 | 290th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 33 | — |
| Punt returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 9 | — |
| Yards | 90 | — |
| Average | 10 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 25 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · California | — | 53 | ~17 (5–23) | 2 | · | · | 32% |
| Wk 2 · San Diego State | ✓ WR | 67 | ~53 (35–65) | 8 | 1 | 1 | 79% |
| Wk 3 · Purdue | ✓ WR | 80 | ~60 (39–73) | 8 | · | · | 75% |
| Wk 4 · Maryland | ✓ WR | 63 | ~45 (30–55) | 5 | 4 | · | 71% |
| Wk 6 · Oregon | ✓ WR | 70 | ~50 (33–61) | 6 | · | · | 71% |
| Wk 7 · Wisconsin | — | 71 | ~49 (32–60) | 6 | · | 1 | 69% |
| Wk 8 · Michigan State | — | 78 | ~64 (42–78) | 10 | 1 | · | 82% |
| Wk 9 · Nevada | ✓ WR | 59 | ~44 (29–54) | 6 | 3 | · | 75% |
| Season | 5 GS | 541 | 382 (320–445) | 51 | 9 | 2 | 71% |
Position Room
14 WRs on the UCLA roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Semaj Morgan | WR | SR | 36 | 415 | 2 | 22% | +0.45 |
| 2 | Brian Rowe Jr. | WR | SO | 19 | 326 | 1 | 15% | +0.41 |
| 11 | Landon Ellis | WR | SR | 9 | 136 | 1 | 10% | +0.23 |
| 86 | Jalen Saint Paul | WR | JR | 9 | 108 | 0 | — | — |
| 1 | Aidan Mizell | WR | SR | 7 | 175 | 1 | 11% | +0.29 |
| 7 | Mikey Matthews | WR | SR | 4 | 88 | 0 | 21% | +1.10 |
| Leland Smith | WR | 4 | 79 | 0 | 6% | +1.69 | ||
| 12 | Jace Brown | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | Marcus Harris | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | Shane Rosenthal | WR | SO | — | — | — | 4% | -0.76 |
| 23 | Jackson Meehan | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | Major Pride | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | Markus Kier | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Kenneth Moore III | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. UCLA depth chart →