Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 4.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 3.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Washington's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted5 targets charted
2025 charting · Notre Dame
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (2 of Washington’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted2 targets charted
Career
5 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Notre Dame#1 · 7-1 | 5 | 17% | 3 | 15 | 0 | 4.1% |
| 2025 | Notre Dame#3 · 10-2 | 3 | 18% | 5 | 34 | 1 | 5.1% |
| 2024 |  Arkansas#43 · 7-6 | 2 | 9% | 2 | 25 | 1 | 3.5% |
| 2023 | Arkansas#68 · 4-8 | 4 | 21% | 11 | 170 | 2 | 9.7% |
| 2022 | Arkansas#40 · 7-6 | 1 | 2% | 1 | 17 | 1 | 3.4% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Ty Washington's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Ty Washington's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | vs Wisconsin | W 41–13 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2 |  Rice | W 52–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  Michigan State | W 27–10 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 | @ Purdue | W 49–10 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 5 | @ North Carolina | W 37–26 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 6 |  Stanford | W 58–7 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 7 | @ BYU | L 24–28 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 | vs Navy | W 35–13 | 3.2 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2026 · 3 games | 3.9 | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 0 | 6 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 3 | 1350th / 2089 |
| Yards | 15 | 1631st / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 6 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Wisconsin | 61 | ~18 (8–26) | 1 | 30% |
| Wk 2 · Rice | 65 | ~19 (9–27) | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 4 · Purdue | 58 | ~17 (8–24) | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 5 · North Carolina | 75 | ~22 (10–31) | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 9 · Navy | 59 | ~17 (8–24) | 1 | 29% |
| Season | 540 | 93 (64–125) | 5 | 17% |
Position Room
8 TEs on the Notre Dame roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | Jack Larsen | TE | JR | 7 | 65 | 0 | 9% | +0.40 |
| 87 | Cooper Flanagan | TE | SR | 6 | 48 | 2 | 8% | +0.00 |
| 88 | James Flanigan | TE | SO | 5 | 22 | 1 | 6% | +0.23 |
| Ty Washington | TE | 3 | 15 | 0 | 3% | -0.20 | ||
| 24 | Ian Premer | TE | FR | 2 | 22 | 0 | 4% | +1.03 |
| 42 | Henry Garrity | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Preston Fryzel | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Austin Ratigan | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Notre Dame depth chart →