Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 71 | — |
| Success rate | 38.0% | 263rd / 332 |
| Explosive run rate | 5.6% | 308th / 332 |
| Stuffed at the line | 28.2% | 322nd / 332 |
| First downs | 13 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 15 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 6 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 21 | — |
| Target share | 9.0% | — |
| Catch rate | 61.9% | — |
| Success rate per target | 28.6% | — |
| Yards per target | 3.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 7 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Emory's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted23 targets charted
Run direction79 carries
2025 charting · UTEP
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (5 of Emory’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted8 targets charted
Run direction69 carries
Career
3 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  California#93 · 3-6 | 9 | 43% | 77 | 238 | 3.1 | 4 | 38.0% | 16 | 90 | 0 | 9.0% |
| 2025 |  UTEP#128 · 2-10 | 12 | 49% | 119 | 569 | 4.8 | 4 | 38.6% | 16 | 103 | 2 | 5.3% |
| 2024 | UTEP#128 · 3-9 | 1 | 2% | 6 | 23 | 3.8 | 0 | 33.3% | 2 | 12 | 0 | 6.1% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Ashten Emory's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Ashten Emory's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  UCLA | L 24–45 | — | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 | @ Syracuse | W 21–18 | — | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 |  Wagner | W 49–7 | 6.1 | 6 | 17 | 2.8 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 | 15 |
| 4 |  Clemson | L 10–24 | 5.7 | 7 | 31 | 4.4 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 11 |
| 5 | @ UNLV | L 31–39 | 6.5 | 12 | 48 | 4.0 | 1 | 20 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 |  Virginia Tech | W 25–20 | 7.3 | 19 | 46 | 2.4 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 11 |
| 7 |  Wake Forest | L 7–41 | 5.8 | 12 | 56 | 4.7 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 5 |
| 8 | @ SMU | L 20–59 | 4.5 | 14 | 27 | 1.9 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 9 | @ NC State | L 10–31 | 4.4 | 4 | 6 | 1.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 2026 · 9 games | 5.8 | 77 | 238 | 3.1 | 4 | 20 | 16 | 90 | 5.6 | 0 | 15 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 77 | — |
| Yards | 238 | 291st / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 3.1 | 277th / 312 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 133rd / 683 |
| Long | 20 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 16 | 434th / 2089 |
| Yards | 90 | 833rd / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 5.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 15 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 0 | — |
| Solo | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 1 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · UCLA | — | 86 | ~11 (3–21) | 1 | · | 13% |
| Wk 2 · Syracuse | — | 60 | ~10 (2–19) | 2 | · | 17% |
| Wk 3 · Wagner | — | 71 | ~17 (12–22) | 7 | · | 24% |
| Wk 4 · Clemson | — | 56 | ~21 (14–27) | 9 | · | 38% |
| Wk 5 · UNLV | — | 84 | ~51 (43–57) | 15 | · | 61% |
| Wk 6 · Virginia Tech | — | 69 | ~58 (49–64) | 29 | 1 | 84% |
| Wk 7 · Wake Forest | ✓ RB | 70 | ~42 (35–47) | 17 | · | 60% |
| Wk 8 · SMU | ✓ RB | 66 | ~43 (36–48) | 16 | · | 65% |
| Wk 9 · NC State | — | 72 | ~20 (14–26) | 7 | · | 28% |
| Season | 2 GS | 634 | 273 (226–346) | 103 | 1 | 43% |
Position Room
7 RBs on the California roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Adam Mohammed | RB | JR | 82 | 363 | 4.4 | 3 | 18 | +0.16 |
| 20 | Ashten Emory | RB | SO | 77 | 238 | 3.1 | 4 | 16 | -0.12 |
| 25 | Anthony League | RB | FR | 13 | 53 | 4.1 | 0 | 15 | -0.24 |
| 21 | Carson Perry-Smith | RB | SO | 10 | 34 | 3.4 | 0 | 4 | +0.43 |
| 1 | Carter Vargas | RB | SO | 4 | 14 | 3.5 | 0 | 2 | -0.25 |
| 13 | Victor Santino | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | Dean-Taylor Chapman | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. California depth chart →