EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 7.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 80.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 12.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 500th / 1676 |
| Yards | 60 | 540th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 12 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 158th / 527 |
| Long | 41 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Texas | ✓ TE | 70 | ~44 (37–53) | 2 | 63% |
| Wk 2 · UTSA | ✓ TE | 78 | ~55 (47–66) | 3 | 71% |
| Wk 3 · North Texas | ✓ TE | 71 | ~43 (36–52) | 1 | 61% |
| Season | 3 GS | 219 | 142 (120–172) | 6 | 65% |
6 TEs on the Texas State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | Blake Smith | TE | SR | 5 | 60 | 1 | 6% | +0.62 |
| 18 | Ty Stamey | TE | JR | 2 | 25 | 0 | 4% | +0.66 |
| 9 | Arvis Battle Jr. | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Cole Snodgrass | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Russell Crawford | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Jake Simpson | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Texas State depth chart →