Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 17 | — |
| Target share | 8.8% | — |
| Catch rate | 58.8% | — |
| Success rate per target | 47.1% | — |
| Yards per target | 9.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 17.6% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 23.5% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 5 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Robinson's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted20 targets charted
Game Log
Chance Robinson's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Virginia | L 8–34 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Richmond | W 73–0 | 5.1 | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 9 |
| 3 | @ Vanderbilt | L 31–35 | 4.0 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 4 |  App State | W 41–31 | 4.8 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 5 |  Louisville | W 31–28 | 3.3 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| 6 |  Wake Forest | L 14–38 | 7.1 | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 1 | 24 |
| 8 | @ Stanford | L 28–31 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  California | W 31–10 | 7.7 | 4 | 76 | 19.0 | 1 | 38 |
| 2026 · 6 games | 5.3 | 12 | 168 | 14.0 | 2 | 38 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 12 | 600th / 2089 |
| Yards | 168 | 513th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 14 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 38 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Richmond | — | 70 | ~41 (27–50) | 3 | 59% |
| Wk 3 · Vanderbilt | — | 78 | ~21 (7–29) | 2 | 27% |
| Wk 4 · App State | — | 78 | ~15 (5–21) | 2 | 19% |
| Wk 5 · Louisville | — | 84 | ~12 (4–20) | 1 | 14% |
| Wk 6 · Wake Forest | — | 63 | ~37 (12–51) | 4 | 59% |
| Wk 8 · Stanford | ✓ WR | 65 | ~39 (12–53) | 4 | 60% |
| Wk 9 · California | — | 64 | ~43 (28–52) | 4 | 67% |
| Season | 1 GS | 553 | 208 (129–253) | 20 | 38% |
Position Room
17 WRs on the NC State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Keenan Jackson | WR | JR | 30 | 456 | 6 | 17% | +0.73 |
| Victor Snow | WR | 19 | 175 | 0 | 11% | +0.21 | ||
| Joshisa Trader | WR | 16 | 221 | 0 | 16% | +0.60 | ||
| 82 | Chance Robinson | WR | JR | 12 | 168 | 2 | 8% | +0.53 |
| Tyran Warren | WR | 8 | 119 | 1 | 7% | +0.04 | ||
| 5 | Davion Dozier | WR | SR | 4 | 35 | 0 | 7% | -0.07 |
| 6 | Ashton Locklear | WR | SR | 3 | 20 | 1 | 4% | -0.71 |
| 83 | Amiri Acker | WR | FR | 1 | 14 | 0 | 3% | +0.88 |
| 12 | Teddy Hoffmann | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | Je'rel Bolder | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | Sam Dodd | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | Jason Schutt | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | Cameron Cornthwaite | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | Addison Carlson | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Ethan Dowdy | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Tyreek Copper | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Jai Richburg | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. NC State depth chart →