Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 75 | — |
| Target share | 22.0% | 122nd / 534 |
| Catch rate | 73.3% | 115th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 48.0% | 275th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 6.7 | 388th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 6.7% | 412th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 9.3% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 25 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 9 | — |
Charting
Where Hendricks's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted81 targets charted
2025 charting · Ohio
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (6 of Hendricks’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted40 targets charted
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  California#93 · 3-6 | 9 | 80% | 61 | 565 | 4 | 22.0% |
| 2025 |  Ohio#68 · 9-4 | 12 | 84% | 71 | 1037 | 7 | 35.2% |
| 2024 | Ohio#45 · 11-3 | 13 | 65% | 40 | 471 | 1 | 14.6% |
| 2023 | Ohio#62 · 10-3 | 6 | 21% | 11 | 108 | 0 | 7.8% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Chase Hendricks's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Chase Hendricks's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  UCLA | L 24–45 | 7.6 | 6 | 66 | 11.0 | 1 | 30 |
| 2 | @ Syracuse | W 21–18 | 6.6 | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 1 | 14 |
| 3 |  Wagner | W 49–7 | 7.9 | 9 | 98 | 10.9 | 0 | 31 |
| 4 |  Clemson | L 10–24 | 6.2 | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 0 | 17 |
| 5 | @ UNLV | L 31–39 | 6.4 | 8 | 35 | 4.4 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 |  Virginia Tech | W 25–20 | 7.8 | 7 | 94 | 13.4 | 0 | 42 |
| 7 |  Wake Forest | L 7–41 | 6.9 | 8 | 54 | 6.8 | 0 | 11 |
| 8 | @ SMU | L 20–59 | 7.9 | 7 | 83 | 11.9 | 1 | 28 |
| 9 | @ NC State | L 10–31 | 7.6 | 7 | 67 | 9.6 | 1 | 30 |
| 2026 · 9 games | 7.2 | 61 | 565 | 9.3 | 4 | 42 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 1 | — |
| Yards | -1 | 1375th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | -1 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 0 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 61 | 6th / 2089 |
| Yards | 565 | 49th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 9.3 | 388th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 69th / 914 |
| Long | 42 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · UCLA | ✓ WR | 86 | ~65 (43–79) | 9 | 76% |
| Wk 2 · Syracuse | ✓ WR | 60 | ~47 (31–57) | 8 | 78% |
| Wk 3 · Wagner | ✓ WR | 71 | ~59 (39–71) | 11 | 83% |
| Wk 4 · Clemson | ✓ WR | 56 | ~43 (28–52) | 5 | 77% |
| Wk 5 · UNLV | ✓ WR | 84 | ~60 (39–73) | 9 | 71% |
| Wk 6 · Virginia Tech | — | 69 | ~54 (35–66) | 8 | 78% |
| Wk 7 · Wake Forest | ✓ WR | 70 | ~60 (39–70) | 11 | 86% |
| Wk 8 · SMU | ✓ WR | 66 | ~54 (35–66) | 10 | 82% |
| Wk 9 · NC State | — | 72 | ~63 (41–72) | 11 | 88% |
| Season | 7 GS | 634 | 505 (434–597) | 82 | 80% |
Position Room
13 WRs on the California roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Chase Hendricks | WR | SR | 61 | 565 | 4 | 20% | +0.24 |
| 9 | Ian Strong | WR | SR | 35 | 478 | 1 | 16% | +0.23 |
| 81 | Tyree Sams | WR | FR | 17 | 82 | 0 | 9% | -0.38 |
| 6 | Kyion Grayes | WR | JR | 12 | 138 | 1 | 7% | +0.52 |
| 4 | Jordan King | WR | SR | 11 | 108 | 1 | 7% | +0.36 |
| 10 | Cooper Perry | WR | SO | 8 | 111 | 1 | 6% | +0.30 |
| 15 | Mark Hamper | WR | JR | 5 | 60 | 0 | 6% | +0.94 |
| 19 | Trevor Rogers | WR | SO | 3 | 16 | 0 | 5% | -0.66 |
| 5 | QuaRon Adams | WR | SR | 1 | -2 | 0 | 2% | -0.60 |
| 16 | Kai Meza | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | EJ Morgan | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Cole Boscia | WR | SR | — | — | — | 2% | -0.30 |
| 87 | Meyer Swinney | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. California depth chart →