Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 17 | — |
| Target share | 8.5% | — |
| Catch rate | 47.1% | — |
| Success rate per target | 35.3% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.2 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 17.6% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 4 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 4 | — |
Charting
Where Correia's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted16 targets charted
Game Log
Gavin Correia's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ USC | L 0–39 | 5.2 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
| 2 |  Sacramento State | W 49–3 | 4.0 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 3 | @ San José State | W 26–10 | 3.7 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| 4 |  Rice | W 38–24 | 4.5 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 5 | @ Washington State | W 26–6 | 4.7 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 |  Boise State | L 31–38 | 7.7 | 3 | 36 | 12.0 | 1 | 15 |
| 7 | @ San Diego State | L 23–26 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  Oregon State | W 38–22 | 5.5 | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.0 | 9 | 87 | 9.7 | 1 | 15 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 9 | 761st / 2089 |
| Yards | 87 | 858th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 9.7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 15 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · USC | ✓ TE | 45 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | 58% |
| Wk 2 · Sacramento State | ✓ TE | 63 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | 40% |
| Wk 3 · San José State | ✓ TE | 68 | ~42 (36–51) | 3 | 62% |
| Wk 4 · Rice | — | 68 | ~37 (17–53) | 3 | 54% |
| Wk 5 · Washington State | ✓ TE | 68 | ~42 (36–51) | 2 | 62% |
| Wk 6 · Boise State | ✓ TE | 51 | ~41 (35–50) | 5 | 80% |
| Wk 7 · San Diego State | — | 65 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | 40% |
| Wk 9 · Oregon State | — | 55 | ~35 (16–50) | 2 | 64% |
| Season | 5 GS | 483 | 274 (210–382) | 18 | 57% |
Position Room
12 TEs on the Fresno State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | Gavin Correia | TE | SO | 9 | 87 | 1 | 8% | +0.04 |
| 87 | Jake Appleget | TE | SR | 8 | 108 | 0 | 6% | +0.95 |
| 88 | Dallas Gaius-Anyaegbu | TE | FR | 2 | 39 | 0 | 3% | +0.75 |
| 89 | Brock Lium | TE | JR | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0% | -5.35 |
| 30 | Jace Nixon | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Ryan Lewis | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | Sebastien Boydell | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | Zane Gerbo | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | Sylas Austin | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | Brayden Ford | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Robert Lucero | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Bryce Mcdaniel | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Fresno State depth chart →