Snap share
54%
3 of 3 started · likely 22–78%
Receptions
3
788th of 1676 in FBS
Rec. yards
22
1015th of 1662 in FBS
Yards / catch
7.3
Rec. TD
0
EPA / play
+0.22
4 plays
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 3 | 788th / 1676 |
| Yards | 22 | 1015th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 7.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 12 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · USC | ✓ TE | 45 | · | · | — |
| Wk 2 · Sacramento State | ✓ TE | 63 | ~40 (34–48) | 2 | 63% |
| Wk 3 · San José State | ✓ TE | 68 | ~31 (14–44) | 2 | 46% |
| Season | 3 GS | 131 | 71 (29–102) | 4 | 54% |
Position Room
12 TEs on the Fresno State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | Gavin Correia | TE | SO | 3 | 21 | 0 | 7% | +0.07 |
| 87 | Jake Appleget | TE | SR | 3 | 22 | 0 | 7% | +0.22 |
| 30 | Jace Nixon | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Ryan Lewis | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | Sebastien Boydell | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | Zane Gerbo | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | Sylas Austin | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | Brayden Ford | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Robert Lucero | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Bryce Mcdaniel | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Dallas Gaius-Anyaegbu | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Brock Lium | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Fresno State depth chart →