Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 9 | — |
| Target share | 4.9% | — |
| Catch rate | 66.7% | — |
| Success rate per target | 55.6% | — |
| Yards per target | 7.7 | — |
| Explosive catches | 11.1% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 22.2% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Provience's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted13 targets charted
Game Log
Hunter Provience's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Defense | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ Virginia | L 8–34 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  Richmond | W 73–0 | 6.0 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 1 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 | @ Vanderbilt | L 31–35 | 6.0 | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 |  App State | W 41–31 | 5.4 | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 |  Louisville | W 31–28 | 6.1 | 1 | 24 | 24.0 | 0 | 24 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 |  Wake Forest | L 14–38 | 6.6 | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 1 | 6 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 8 | @ Stanford | L 28–31 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 9 |  California | W 31–10 | 4.0 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.5 | 9 | 79 | 8.8 | 2 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 9 | 761st / 2089 |
| Yards | 79 | 906th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 8.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 24 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4438th / 5664 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Virginia | ✓ TE | 51 | ~20 (9–29) | 2 | · | 39% |
| Wk 2 · Richmond | — | 70 | ~20 (9–29) | 1 | · | 29% |
| Wk 3 · Vanderbilt | ✓ TE | 78 | ~31 (14–44) | 2 | 1 | 40% |
| Wk 4 · App State | ✓ TE | 78 | ~30 (14–43) | 2 | · | 38% |
| Wk 5 · Louisville | — | 84 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | · | 30% |
| Wk 6 · Wake Forest | — | 63 | ~34 (16–49) | 4 | · | 54% |
| Wk 9 · California | — | 64 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | · | 39% |
| Season | 3 GS | 553 | 185 (142–258) | 13 | 1 | 33% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the NC State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Preston Douglas | TE | SO | 26 | 304 | 1 | 13% | +0.66 |
| 86 | Hunter Provience | TE | SR | 9 | 79 | 2 | 6% | +0.58 |
| 4 | Vander Ploog | TE | SO | 2 | 25 | 0 | 7% | +1.79 |
| Tex Vaughn | TE | 2 | 9 | 0 | 8% | -0.44 | ||
| 44 | Gus Ritchey | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Stephen Brown | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Ian Flynt | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. NC State depth chart →