Snap share
48%
likely 20–69%
Receptions
4
622nd of 1676 in FBS
Rec. yards
33
830th of 1662 in FBS
Yards / catch
8.3
Rec. TD
1
158th of 527 in FBS
EPA / play
+0.69
5 plays
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 6.4% | — |
| Catch rate | 80.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 6.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 4 | 622nd / 1676 |
| Yards | 33 | 830th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 8.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 158th / 527 |
| Long | 15 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Akron | 67 | ~29 (13–41) | 2 | 43% |
| Wk 3 · Miami | 63 | ~34 (16–49) | 3 | 54% |
| Season | 130 | 63 (26–90) | 5 | 48% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Wake Forest roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Kamrean Johnson | TE | SR | 4 | 33 | 1 | 6% | +0.69 |
| 85 | Will Loerzel | TE | SO | 3 | 31 | 0 | 6% | +0.01 |
| 81 | Landon Morris | TE | SR | 1 | 13 | 0 | 9% | -0.17 |
| 84 | Dominick Barry | TE | FR | 1 | 6 | 0 | 4% | -0.31 |
| 48 | Matthew Lusardi | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Brady Shust | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Wake Forest depth chart →