EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS QB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Passing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Dropbacks | 258 | — |
| Success rate | 52.3% | 11th / 181 |
| Explosive pass rate | 15.0% | 22nd / 181 |
| Deep-throw rate | 11.4% | 123rd / 181 |
| Sack rate | 4.7% | 79th / 181 |
| Interception rate | 2.0% | — |
| 3rd-down conversion | 44.4% | 31st / 181 |
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 47 | — |
| Success rate | 42.6% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 19.1% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 36.2% | — |
| First downs | 12 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 9 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 4 | — |
Where Jennings's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (6 of Jennings’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
5 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Cmp/Att | Pass yds | TD–INT | Y/A | Dropback SR | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far | SMU#29 · 6-2 | 8 | 93% | 185/251 | 2433 | 21–5 | 9.7 | 52.3% | 56 | 116 | 2.1 | 2 | 42.6% |
| 2025 | SMU#20 · 9-4 | 13 | 97% | 300/454 | 3641 | 26–13 | 8.0 | 43.8% | 70 | 54 | 0.8 | 4 | 38.8% |
| 2024 | SMU#11 · 11-3 | 14 | 87% | 247/380 | 3245 | 23–11 | 8.5 | 45.7% | 101 | 354 | 3.5 | 5 | 48.0% |
| 2023 | SMU#18 · 11-3 | 7 | 24% | 61/105 | 618 | 5–2 | 5.9 | 33.3% | 37 | 142 | 3.8 | 1 | 42.3% |
| 2022 | SMU#52 · 7-6 | 4 | 6% | 17/22 | 205 | 1–0 | 9.3 | 45.0% | 5 | 8 | 1.6 | 0 | 33.3% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Kevin Jennings's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Kevin Jennings's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Passing | Rushing | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Cmp | Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ | W 27–24 | 8.4 | 26 | 36 | 72.2 | 430 | 11.9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 33 | 6.6 | 0 | 14 |
| 2 | W 56–10 | 9.8 | 14 | 16 | 87.5 | 337 | 21.1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 0 | 11 | |
| 3 | @ | L 31–41 | 4.1 | 24 | 35 | 68.6 | 222 | 6.3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 35 | 3.9 | 0 | 19 |
| 4 | W 34–24 | 9.1 | 33 | 39 | 84.6 | 464 | 11.9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0.6 | 1 | 14 | |
| 5 | W 25–16 | 5.7 | 20 | 30 | 66.7 | 160 | 5.3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | -7 | -0.7 | 1 | 10 | |
| 7 | W 23–13 | 6.8 | 23 | 36 | 63.9 | 246 | 6.8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 0 | 33 | |
| 8 | W 59–20 | 7.5 | 16 | 23 | 69.6 | 223 | 9.7 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 26 | 3.7 | 0 | 11 | |
| 9 | @ | L 27–30 | 7.5 | 29 | 36 | 80.6 | 352 | 9.8 | 2 | 0 | 13 | -6 | -0.5 | 0 | 13 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 7.4 | 185 | 251 | 73.7 | 2434 | 9.7 | 21 | 5 | 56 | 115 | 2.1 | 2 | 33 | ||
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 185 | — |
| Attempts | 251 | — |
| Completion % | 73.7% | 3rd / 146 |
| Yards | 2433 | 8th / 276 |
| Yards / att. | 9.7 | 7th / 146 |
| Touchdowns | 21 | 7th / 276 |
| Interceptions | 5 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 56 | — |
| Yards | 116 | 461st / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 2.1 | 297th / 312 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 266th / 683 |
| Long | 33 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Estimated snaps: every offensive play credited to the QB running the offense. Close to a true snap count
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Florida State | — | 67 | 67 | 41 | 100% |
| Wk 2 · UC Davis | ✓ QB | 55 | 28 | 19 | 51% |
| Wk 3 · Louisville | ✓ QB | 79 | 79 | 44 | 100% |
| Wk 4 · Missouri State | ✓ QB | 78 | 78 | 45 | 100% |
| Wk 5 · Boston College | — | 63 | 63 | 42 | 100% |
| Wk 7 · Virginia | ✓ QB | 69 | 69 | 42 | 100% |
| Wk 8 · California | ✓ QB | 68 | 58 | 30 | 85% |
| Wk 9 · Syracuse | — | 67 | 67 | 49 | 100% |
| Season | 5 GS | 546 | 509 | 312 | 93% |
5 QBs on the SMU roster, ordered by att
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Att | Yds | TD | INT | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Kevin Jennings | QB | SR | 251 | 2433 | 21 | 5 | +0.40 |
| 1 | Ty Hawkins | QB | SO | 14 | 117 | 2 | 0 | +0.53 |
| 14 | Charlie Fiser | QB | SR | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | -0.14 |
| 12 | Cole Leinart | QB | FR | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +0.07 |
| 28 | Mabrey Mettauer | QB | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 12+ plays per team game. SMU depth chart →