EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 5 | — |
| Success rate | 20.0% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 0.0% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 60.0% | — |
| First downs | 0 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 0 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 8 | — |
| Yards | 20 | 695th / 1194 |
| Yards / carry | 2.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 7 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 1 | 1257th / 1676 |
| Yards | 18 | 1101st / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 18 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 158th / 527 |
| Long | 18 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oklahoma | 56 | ~15 (10–19) | 4 | 27% |
| Wk 2 · Texas Southern | 54 | ~7 (2–14) | 3 | 13% |
| Wk 3 · Michigan | 47 | ~10 (2–19) | 3 | 21% |
| Season | 157 | 32 (16–70) | 10 | 20% |
7 RBs on the UTEP roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Tavorus Jones | RB | JR | 30 | 162 | 5.4 | 1 | 6 | +0.17 |
| 32 | Lamar Sperling | RB | JR | 8 | 20 | 2.5 | 0 | 1 | -0.04 |
| 6 | Elijah McCoy | RB | SO | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | -0.47 |
| 8 | Kam Thomas | RB | SR | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 | 3 | +0.75 |
| 19 | Daveon Singleton | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | Jaden Moore | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | Chris Hunter | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. UTEP depth chart →