Snap share
15%
likely 5–30%

Efficiency & Role

EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies

EPA per play by situation

4 plays · -1.0 total EPA · not enough plays to rank yet
All plays-0.25
Rushing-0.25
1st down+0.37
2nd down-0.62
3rd down-0.13
Standard downs-0.13
Passing downs-0.60
YoungRB average

Share of team plays

How often the offense runs through this player. Pass = targets or dropbacks, rush = carries
All plays3%
Pass plays0%
Run plays5%
1st down2%
2nd down4%
3rd down3%
Standard downs3%
Passing downs2%
YoungRB average

2026 Season Stats

FBS rank among qualifying players

Rushing2026FBS rank
Carries4—
Yards13792nd / 1194
Yards / carry3.3—
Touchdowns0—
Long6—

Snaps by Game

Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works

GameTeam playsEst. snapsPlays involvedSnap share
Wk 1 · Georgia Tech75~13 (3–25)317%
Wk 2 · Weber State72~9 (2–17)113%
Season14722 (8–44)415%

Position Room

10 RBs on the Colorado roster, ordered by car

#PlayerPosClassCarYdsYPCTDRecEPA/play
29Micah WelchRBJR311785.722+0.12
23JaQuail SmithRBSO241526.302+0.21
26Damian Henderson IIRBSR241114.60—-0.02
20DeKalon TaylorRBSR11565.104+0.09
Richard YoungRB4133.30—-0.25
27Bryce HicksRBJR273.501-0.56
34Titus BautistaRBJR1770—+0.53
28Cam NetwonRBFR——————
37Leonardo ValleRBSO——————
47Cody JordanRBFR——————

Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Colorado depth chart →