Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 28 | — |
| Target share | 12.0% | 446th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 57.1% | 399th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 50.0% | 220th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 7.5 | 314th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 10.7% | 279th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 3.6% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 6 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 5 | — |
Charting
Where Kekahuna's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted28 targets charted
2025 charting · Wisconsin
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (5 of Kekahuna’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted21 targets charted
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  North Carolina#50 · 4-4 | 8 | 67% | 17 | 219 | 1 | 12.0% |
| 2025 |  Wisconsin#72 · 4-8 | 12 | 68% | 26 | 211 | 0 | 18.1% |
| 2024 | Wisconsin#58 · 5-7 | 8 | 41% | 25 | 339 | 2 | 13.2% |
| 2023 | Wisconsin#44 · 7-6 | 1 | 5% | 4 | 64 | 0 | 10.3% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Trech Kekahuna's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Trech Kekahuna's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Returns | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | KR | KR yds | PR | PR yds | TD |
| 1 | vs TCU | W 15–10 | 2.8 | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 0 | 21 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  East Tennessee State | W 35–3 | 5.1 | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | 16 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 | @ Clemson | L 20–28 | 5.4 | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 9 | · | · | 2 | 18 | · |
| 5 |  Notre Dame | L 26–37 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 6 | @ Pittsburgh | W 21–17 | 4.2 | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 10 | · | · | 2 | 6 | · |
| 7 | @ Duke | W 24–20 | 6.1 | 2 | 42 | 21.0 | 0 | 26 | · | · | 1 | 3 | · |
| 8 |  Syracuse | L 30–31 | 6.3 | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 0 | 17 | · | · | 2 | 22 | · |
| 9 |  Miami | L 35–38 | 7.2 | 3 | 57 | 19.0 | 1 | 23 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.3 | 17 | 219 | 12.9 | 1 | 26 | · | · | 7 | 49 | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 17 | 405th / 2089 |
| Yards | 219 | 396th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 12.9 | 207th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 26 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
| Punt returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 7 | — |
| Yards | 49 | — |
| Average | 7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 15 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · TCU | ✓ WR | 57 | ~35 (11–48) | 3 | · | 61% |
| Wk 2 · East Tennessee State | — | 53 | ~26 (8–36) | 2 | · | 49% |
| Wk 3 · Clemson | ✓ WR | 69 | ~50 (33–61) | 4 | 2 | 72% |
| Wk 5 · Notre Dame | — | 51 | ~25 (8–34) | 1 | · | 49% |
| Wk 6 · Pittsburgh | — | 51 | ~29 (9–40) | 2 | 2 | 57% |
| Wk 7 · Duke | ✓ WR | 64 | ~46 (30–56) | 4 | 1 | 72% |
| Wk 8 · Syracuse | — | 69 | ~60 (39–69) | 8 | 2 | 87% |
| Wk 9 · Miami | ✓ WR | 64 | ~48 (32–58) | 5 | · | 75% |
| Season | 4 GS | 478 | 319 (198–387) | 29 | 7 | 67% |
Position Room
11 WRs on the North Carolina roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jordan Shipp | WR | JR | 45 | 587 | 3 | 22% | +0.91 |
| 2 | Trech Kekahuna | WR | JR | 17 | 219 | 1 | 11% | +0.18 |
| 14 | C.J. Sadler | WR | FR | 8 | 113 | 0 | 9% | +0.48 |
| 4 | Mason Humphrey | WR | SR | 5 | 57 | 0 | 9% | -0.01 |
| 17 | Nyqir Helton | WR | FR | 4 | 34 | 0 | 8% | +0.06 |
| 16 | Zamaurious Robertson | WR | FR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4% | +1.61 |
| 6 | Dayton Sneed | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Nathan Leacock | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | Jaden Jefferson | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Keeyun Chapman | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| Kymistrii Young | WR | — | — | — | 7% | -0.90 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. North Carolina depth chart →