Snap share
17%
34 of 200 snaps
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS QB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Passing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Dropbacks | 6 | — |
| Success rate | 50.0% | — |
| Explosive pass rate | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-throw rate | 0.0% | — |
| Sack rate | 0.0% | — |
| Interception rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down conversion | 100.0% | — |
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 6 | — |
| Attempts | 7 | — |
| Completion % | 85.7% | — |
| Yards | 44 | 211th / 270 |
| Yards / att. | 6.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 189th / 270 |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 5 | — |
| Yards | 29 | 606th / 1194 |
| Yards / carry | 5.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 200th / 476 |
| Long | 15 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps: every offensive play credited to the QB running the offense. Close to a true snap count
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Toledo | 83 | 2 | 1 | 2% |
| Wk 2 · Eastern Michigan | 71 | 20 | 8 | 28% |
| Wk 3 · Notre Dame | 46 | 12 | 5 | 26% |
| Season | 200 | 34 | 14 | 17% |
Position Room
5 QBs on the Michigan State roster, ordered by att
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Att | Yds | TD | INT | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Alessio Milivojevic | QB | SO | 71 | 540 | 3 | 2 | +0.17 |
| 2 | Cam Fancher | QB | SR | 7 | 44 | 0 | 0 | +0.27 |
| 10 | Kayd Coffman | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | Leo Hannan | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | Peyton Babbitt | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 12+ plays per team game. Michigan State depth chart →