Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 138 | — |
| Success rate | 38.4% | 258th / 332 |
| Explosive run rate | 9.4% | 263rd / 332 |
| Stuffed at the line | 15.2% | 156th / 332 |
| First downs | 32 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 17 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 7 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 34 | — |
| Target share | 13.4% | 395th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 73.5% | 112th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 35.3% | 469th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 6.4 | 414th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 8.8% | 347th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 2.9% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 6 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Ford's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted36 targets charted
Run direction154 carries
2025 charting · Stanford
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (2 of Ford’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted5 targets charted
Run direction45 carries
Career
3 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Stanford#100 · 4-5 | 9 | 63% | 156 | 751 | 4.8 | 8 | 38.4% | 26 | 224 | 1 | 13.4% |
| 2025 | Stanford#93 · 4-8 | 9 | 43% | 145 | 643 | 4.4 | 4 | 43.0% | 11 | 119 | 0 | 8.8% |
| 2024 | Stanford#105 · 3-9 | 9 | 38% | 76 | 309 | 4.1 | 0 | 36.2% | 15 | 84 | 0 | 7.2% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Micah Ford's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Micah Ford's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Hawai'i | W 37–27 | 7.5 | 25 | 99 | 4.0 | 3 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 |  Miami | L 6–45 | 4.4 | 11 | 27 | 2.5 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 3 | @ Duke | L 7–35 | 7.5 | 11 | 76 | 6.9 | 0 | 28 | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 0 | 22 |
| 4 |  Georgia Tech | W 34–27 | 5.7 | 19 | 55 | 2.9 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 5 | @ Wake Forest | L 3–57 | 5.5 | 16 | 45 | 2.8 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 6 | @ Notre Dame | L 7–58 | 5.1 | 13 | 48 | 3.7 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 7 |  Elon | W 34–7 | 10.0 | 19 | 179 | 9.4 | 4 | 81 | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 0 | 19 |
| 8 |  NC State | W 31–28 | 8.8 | 22 | 150 | 6.8 | 0 | 33 | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 0 | 43 |
| 9 | @ Louisville | L 24–52 | 7.6 | 20 | 72 | 3.6 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 48 | 8.0 | 1 | 40 |
| 2026 · 9 games | 6.9 | 156 | 751 | 4.8 | 8 | 81 | 26 | 224 | 8.6 | 1 | 43 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 156 | — |
| Yards | 751 | 20th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 4.8 | 141st / 312 |
| Touchdowns | 8 | 26th / 683 |
| Long | 81 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 26 | 199th / 2089 |
| Yards | 224 | 386th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 8.6 | 412th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 43 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Hawai'i | ✓ RB | 71 | ~53 (45–59) | 28 | · | 75% |
| Wk 1 · Miami | ✓ RB | 65 | ~31 (21–40) | 13 | · | 48% |
| Wk 3 · Duke | ✓ RB | 58 | ~37 (25–48) | 17 | · | 64% |
| Wk 4 · Georgia Tech | ✓ RB | 72 | ~43 (36–48) | 23 | · | 60% |
| Wk 5 · Wake Forest | — | 67 | ~36 (25–47) | 19 | · | 54% |
| Wk 6 · Notre Dame | — | 44 | ~31 (21–40) | 14 | · | 70% |
| Wk 7 · Elon | — | 73 | ~47 (40–52) | 26 | · | 64% |
| Wk 8 · NC State | ✓ RB | 70 | ~50 (42–55) | 25 | 1 | 71% |
| Wk 9 · Louisville | — | 69 | ~46 (39–51) | 26 | 1 | 67% |
| Season | 5 GS | 589 | 374 (325–428) | 191 | 2 | 63% |
Position Room
5 RBs on the Stanford roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Micah Ford | RB | JR | 156 | 751 | 4.8 | 8 | 26 | +0.15 |
| 26 | Sedrick Irvin | RB | SR | 50 | 192 | 3.8 | 0 | 10 | +0.20 |
| 34 | Champ Hampton | RB | JR | 17 | 77 | 4.5 | 0 | 4 | -0.21 |
| 5 | Chris Davis Jr. | RB | SO | 8 | 23 | 2.9 | 0 | — | -0.11 |
| 6 | Tuna Altahir | RB | SR | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | — | -0.05 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Stanford depth chart →