Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 36 | — |
| Success rate | 44.4% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 8.3% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 19.4% | — |
| First downs | 11 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 6 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 8 | — |
| Target share | 4.3% | — |
| Catch rate | 87.5% | — |
| Success rate per target | 37.5% | — |
| Yards per target | 10.3 | — |
| Explosive catches | 12.5% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 12.5% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Irvin's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted12 targets charted
Run direction49 carries
2025 charting · Stanford
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (3 of Irvin’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted3 targets charted
Run direction23 carries
Career
4 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Stanford#100 · 4-5 | 9 | 25% | 50 | 192 | 3.8 | 0 | 44.4% | 10 | 95 | 2 | 4.3% |
| 2025 | Stanford#93 · 4-8 | 10 | 19% | 41 | 118 | 2.9 | 1 | 40.0% | 2 | 13 | 0 | 4.7% |
| 2024 | Stanford#105 · 3-9 | 6 | 11% | 18 | 69 | 3.8 | 0 | 38.5% | 5 | 107 | 0 | 5.5% |
| 2023 | Stanford#113 · 3-9 | 7 | 19% | 26 | 113 | 4.3 | 1 | 25.0% | 2 | 9 | 0 | 3.1% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Sedrick Irvin's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Sedrick Irvin's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Hawai'i | W 37–27 | 6.2 | 8 | 43 | 5.4 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 1 |  Miami | L 6–45 | 5.6 | 6 | 41 | 6.8 | 0 | 27 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 | @ Duke | L 7–35 | 4.9 | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 |  Georgia Tech | W 34–27 | 5.1 | 11 | 33 | 3.0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| 5 | @ Wake Forest | L 3–57 | 5.4 | 6 | 10 | 1.7 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 | 7.0 | 0 | 15 |
| 6 | @ Notre Dame | L 7–58 | — | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 |  Elon | W 34–7 | 5.5 | 7 | 21 | 3.0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 1 | 27 |
| 8 |  NC State | W 31–28 | — | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 1 | 17 |
| 9 | @ Louisville | L 24–52 | 5.2 | 6 | 24 | 4.0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2026 · 9 games | 5.4 | 50 | 192 | 3.8 | 0 | 27 | 10 | 95 | 9.5 | 2 | 27 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 50 | — |
| Yards | 192 | 350th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 3.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 27 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 10 | 705th / 2089 |
| Yards | 95 | 803rd / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 9.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 27 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 0 | — |
| Solo | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 1 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Hawai'i | 71 | ~21 (14–27) | 9 | 1 | 30% |
| Wk 1 · Miami | 65 | ~18 (12–23) | 7 | · | 28% |
| Wk 3 · Duke | 58 | ~13 (3–25) | 5 | · | 22% |
| Wk 4 · Georgia Tech | 72 | ~28 (19–36) | 13 | · | 39% |
| Wk 5 · Wake Forest | 67 | ~19 (13–25) | 9 | · | 28% |
| Wk 6 · Notre Dame | 44 | ~7 (2–14) | 1 | · | 16% |
| Wk 7 · Elon | 73 | ~20 (14–26) | 9 | · | 27% |
| Wk 8 · NC State | 70 | ~8 (2–16) | 2 | · | 11% |
| Wk 9 · Louisville | 69 | ~15 (10–19) | 7 | · | 22% |
| Season | 589 | 149 (123–189) | 62 | 1 | 25% |
Position Room
5 RBs on the Stanford roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Micah Ford | RB | JR | 156 | 751 | 4.8 | 8 | 26 | +0.15 |
| 26 | Sedrick Irvin | RB | SR | 50 | 192 | 3.8 | 0 | 10 | +0.20 |
| 34 | Champ Hampton | RB | JR | 17 | 77 | 4.5 | 0 | 4 | -0.21 |
| 5 | Chris Davis Jr. | RB | SO | 8 | 23 | 2.9 | 0 | — | -0.11 |
| 6 | Tuna Altahir | RB | SR | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | — | -0.05 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Stanford depth chart →