EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 5 | — |
| Success rate | 20.0% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 20.0% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 20.0% | — |
| First downs | 1 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 2 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
Where Hampton's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
4 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far | Stanford#100 · 4-5 | 7 | 13% | 17 | 77 | 4.5 | 0 | 20.0% |
| 2025 | Stanford#93 · 4-8 | 5 | 5% | 11 | 29 | 2.6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| 2024 | Stanford#105 · 3-9 | 3 | 1% | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | — |
| 2023 | Stanford#113 · 3-9 | 1 | 1% | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 0.0% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Champ Hampton's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Champ Hampton's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | W 37–27 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||
| 1 | L 6–45 | — | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | @ | L 7–35 | — | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 4 | W 34–27 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||
| 5 | @ | L 3–57 | — | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 | 7 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ | L 7–58 | — | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 | W 34–7 | — | 3 | 21 | 7.0 | 0 | 8 | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 8 | W 31–28 | 4.4 | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 0 | 11 | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 9 | @ | L 24–52 | 4.6 | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 4.5 | 17 | 77 | 4.5 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 1.5 | 0 | 5 | ||
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 17 | — |
| Yards | 77 | 558th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 4.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 11 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 4 | 1233rd / 2089 |
| Yards | 6 | 1884th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 1.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 5 | — |
| Kick returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 1 | — |
| Yards | 18 | — |
| Average | 18 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 18 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Miami | 65 | ~11 (3–21) | 3 | · | 17% |
| Wk 3 · Duke | 58 | ~8 (2–16) | 3 | · | 14% |
| Wk 5 · Wake Forest | 67 | ~11 (3–21) | 3 | · | 16% |
| Wk 6 · Notre Dame | 44 | ~8 (2–16) | 1 | · | 18% |
| Wk 7 · Elon | 73 | ~13 (3–25) | 3 | · | 18% |
| Wk 8 · NC State | 70 | ~14 (4–27) | 5 | 1 | 20% |
| Wk 9 · Louisville | 69 | ~9 (2–17) | 4 | · | 13% |
| Season | 589 | 74 (54–161) | 22 | 1 | 13% |
5 RBs on the Stanford roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Micah Ford | RB | JR | 156 | 751 | 4.8 | 8 | 26 | +0.15 |
| 26 | Sedrick Irvin | RB | SR | 50 | 192 | 3.8 | 0 | 10 | +0.20 |
| 34 | Champ Hampton | RB | JR | 17 | 77 | 4.5 | 0 | 4 | -0.21 |
| 5 | Chris Davis Jr. | RB | SO | 8 | 23 | 2.9 | 0 | — | -0.11 |
| 6 | Tuna Altahir | RB | SR | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | — | -0.05 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Stanford depth chart →